canon extender ii vs iiicanon extender ii vs iii

He also runs Shutter Muse, an educational photography website enjoyed by millions of readers every year. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS) If I bought one today, the Mark III. Much the same story here with the 2x extenders. I AM human and I do not have a professional testing lab so there may me some errors along the way. There are a lot of factors to consider when choosing between the Canon 1.4 Extender II and III models. Heres a quick compatibility chart to help you out. Image of the Canon 2x III Extender. There is only a very small improvement over the MKII versions and its only noticeable in certain situations. Lets take a look at another sample that was shot with the 1.4x MKIII, Canon 1dMK4 , iso 1250, f5.6, 1/500 , 420mm, 100% crop from above image with 1.4x MKIII extender. IMG4.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-100.jpg' If you think you will benefit from having a longer focal length available to you on a regular basis, then the Canon 1st 4 extender could be worth the cost despite its drawbacks. Canon 6D: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with the Canon 6D. } Combining the focal length multiplier and the maximum aperture reduction provides your resulting lens equivalent. The 2x III grew 2.6 oz (75g) heavier than, and is .21" (5.3mm) shorter than, the Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. It increases the focal length of a lens by a factor of 1.4x while still delivering superb image quality. We hope you find this chart helpful! Tome Rodrigo 14.1K subscribers Subscribe 44K views 6 years ago Here I am showing if you can stack Canon Mark III. There is a noticeable difference between the EF and RF 2x TCs on the EF 600/4 II, with the EF 2xIII delivering sharper results in the center and periphery. Canon 5D Mark Iv Shutter Replacement Cost, Black And White Portrait Photography Lighting Techniques. but it comes with an image quality penalty. Its almost totally clean ! -EF 50mm f/.0 Macro Natural light is always the, Read More Black And White Portrait Photography Lighting TechniquesContinue, Theres a big debate in the photography world about which is better 35mm or 40mm lenses. Lets move on though and look at that MKIII 2x Extender. The 2x adds 2" (50mm) to the length, 12 oz (340g) to the weight and roughly 20% to the cost. In fact, many lenses wont autofocus at all when an Extender is attached- meaning youll have to focus manually every time. You can use natural light, artificial light, or a combination of both. Keep in mind that you can probably buy the 1.4 and 2X II for the price of either III . the values to the right show Photoshop CS5 up-rezzed (resized larger) images created from the native image. Super Spectra coatings were introduced to help reduce ghosting and flare as well as fluorine coating to make water spots and finer prints easier to remove. Unlike the 1.4x, the 2X has always had a noticeable detrimental effect on image quality. There are many factors to consider when choosing between the Canon 1.4 Extender II and III. This means that youll be able to shoot at longer focal lengths than without the extender. Here's some relevant threads. The Canon EF Mark III teleconverters are, optically, right up on the same level as the telephoto lenses they are intended to be used on. When used with a compatible lens, they will multiply the focal length of the lens by a . Two additional lenses in the same number of groups (9/5 vs. 7/5) are found in the III (and likely contribute to the slightly increased weight). Note that barrel distortion causes the center portion of the image (top image in the ISO 12233 tool) to be slightly enlarged, On an APS-C sensor camera body, the effective focal length range is 150-600mm. But theres more to it than just focal length. The lens mount pin and lens mount stopper pin are improved for higher endurance and, This included 1DXII, 5D4, and 1DXIII. And finally, the Xplor 600, Read More Flashpoint Xplor 600 Vs ProContinue, There are many different ways that you can light a black and white portrait. Canon Rebel Series: The 1.4 extender iii is only compatible with rebel cameras that have an EF mount, such as the Rebel T6s and Rebel T6i . I believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II IS and the II Super Telephotos. Apart from that though there is little difference on the outside. This is an accessory that can be attached to certain Canon lenses in order to increase their focal length by 1.4x. Canon 5D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 5D series except for the 5DS and 5DS R, which do not have an EF mount. They exhibit considerably less distortion than the Mark II counterparts. Diameter x Length, Weight The attachment is made from durable metals and polycarbonates, and it features weather-resistant gaskets to protect your camera gear from the elements. The lens is also at f5.6 so its only stopped down a tiny bit from its maximum of f4.o. On the question of 1.4x vs. 2x, the image quality of my 1.4x is far superior to either the EF 2x or EF 2x III that I tested at comparable focal lengths. I need more reach. Its a better lens in every way. IMG9 = new Image(604, 404) Notice the slight color change of the two Series III Extenders pictured in the center above. so the MM (Maximum Magnification) of the lens is also multiplied by 2x. Capture One is a, Theres a lot of debate in the photography world about which lens is better for Nikon cameras, the 17-55 or the 16-80. MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro Photo Lens: Yes into a 140-400mm f/5.6 IS lens (yes, IS still functions normally on all compatible IS lenses). Much the same applies to the 2x: the MkII has 7 elements in 5 groups and the MkIII has 9 elements in 5 groups: CANON EXTENDER EF 2X II - Free . I'm much happier with 2-stops-down 2x III results than wide open results. | Hosted by Kinsta. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens While they do not fit together due to the lack of space at the rear elements, IMG12.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-2x-III-On-Camera.jpg' Can you stack them together? While both brands produce great colors, I think Nikon has the edge. That can be very useful for wildlife or sports photography when you want to get just a little closer without spending money on an entirely new and longer lens. The Canon extenders have a protective rubber ring around the front element to protect both the extender itself KSM filters for all Given the speed of the car and relatively low shutter speed for such speed, the AF tracking was clearly having no troubles. Canon 1dmk4 , iso1250, 1/800, f8.0 , 420mm (300mm + 1.4xMKIII). There are a few key differences between the Xplor 600 and the Pro model that are worth mentioning. creates a very dark viewfinder that makes manual focusing difficult. The 2x III is similar to the 1.4x III and these reviews were prepared simultaneously. The image quality differences most easily noticed between the 2x II and the 2x III are: Results with the Extender 2x III are overall slightly sharper than the Extender 2x II with a difference being most noticeable in the mid-frame and corner areas. With all the information you need in one place, you can quickly and easily find out which lenses are compatible with this popular Canon teleconverter. MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. But, saving money is one of the reasons to buy an extender instead of a lens with a longer native focal length. The lens mount release switch received a cosmetic upgrade, but functions the same. The lens aperture still opens to the same physical diameter, but the ratio of the aperture opening to the focal length is reduced by 2 stops. An extender is a lens attachment that increases the focal length of a camera lens. I own the 1.4x II and III, AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x III worth the cost. These are the facts, now you have to figure out how to get around these problems. Cheers, C. I own a first generation Canon EF 2x. The difference in framing (angle of view) is quite noticeable between the three examples shown. And as stated he didn't say thats the lens he would be using the TC with. The lens release button on the MKIIIs is also larger than on the previous version and it feels a lot nicer under the thumb in operation. So, if you're only considering a 1.4x TC, and don't plan to buy any of the newer telezooms, I'd go with the II. And I'm sure that not everyone can justify the cost difference to go with the 2x III over the 2x II. Of course, there are some trade-offs when using an extender. Canon EF 500mm f/4.5 L USM Lens This is due to improvements in AF precision made possible by the new microcomputer in the extenders.". (I owned the 400 and sold it quickly when I purchased the 500.). EOS 1Ds Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles . But it does seem autofocus with the 70-200f/2.8L II IS is very quick with version III. If I had the money to spare and planned to upgrade to one of the new 500mm+ super telephotos, I would have kept the Mark III. an extension tube installed between them makes the fit possible. So, pick your lens' maximum aperture opening from the following list and understand that it will shift two values to the right Canon extender Mark III vs Mark II. IMG10 = new Image(600, 404) Canon TS-E 45mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift Lens It was however great for shooting the moon.I recently purchased the Canon R6 and have used both the 1.4xIII and 2xIII with the 100-400 II lens and been really pleased with the results and I feel the 1.4x III produces much better results on the R6.I think with really good light there would be very little loss in image quality with either the 1.4 or 2. The Canon Extender EF 1.4x II. I am grateful for your support! Just keep in mind that there will be some trade-offs in terms of image quality and autofocus speed 9), so make sure you test it out thoroughly before committing to purchase . Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. If you are tracking birds in flight, fast sports action at relatively short distances or shooting low contrast subjects in low light, expect a noticeable AF performance decrease. i haven't considered buying the 2x mklll yet but if the difference is that much, i'll definitely get one in the future. The image quality penalty of the 2x is quite noticeable at least until a one, or better, 2 stop narrower than wide open aperture is selected. 03/30/2023: New firmware updates are available. https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1296858/0#12372013, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1002804, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1334727/1#12733577, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1460120, http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t172/Paddywacked/Fred%20Miranda/7D__4843_zpsj3c1igvf.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/131920218/original, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/72483366/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/145804734/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/144892044/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/146201228/original.jpg. CANON 5D MK3, EF 24-70mm 2.8 L, EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L II, EX580 II. The image below was captured with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. AF at center AF point, when any Version I, II or III Canon tele extender is used with compatible EF tele lenses AF at 27 focus points, and the central 9 points acting as cross-type points, with the following lens + extender combinations: EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II lens, with Extender EF 1.4x III Another factor to consider is image quality. //End comment tag.-->, Bringing you this site is my full-time job (typically 60-80 hours per week). This was just a quick look to satisfy my curiosity. Because of that, most people only use Extenders when they absolutely need the extra reach AND have plenty of light to work with (like outdoors during the daytime). Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and what kind of results youre looking for in your photos. A 1.4x extender will decrease your maximum aperture by 1 stop. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens on a These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. Has anyone out there tried both and able to offer an insight into whether the paying extra for the newer version is worthwhile? Canon EF 600mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Entdecke Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Telekonverter - fast neuwertig - #104 in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! IMG6 = new Image(604, 404) This will help combat the AF speed reduction and finally ALWAYS stop the lens down further than you would do in that same situation of you were NOT using the extender. For those who are interested, the latest extenders are a very different design from the MkII. Canon EF Lenses: All except for the EF 50mm f/1.8 II and EF 85mm f/1.2L USM they auto-focused just like with a bare lens.I can not see a difference in IQ. Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 1.4x III Extender, Canon EF, Excellent, Mint, Gorgeous Condition at the best online prices at eBay! The colors produced by Nikon cameras are more accurate and true-to-life than those from Canon. Maybe someone who upgraded I to II can handle that part of the question. However, according to the new item: This will ensure the combination lens information is transmitted correctly and completely. But which extender is compatible with which lens? And, thats pretty much it. 1.4 extender I vs. II vs. III 12 posts, 1 page 1 AntonLargiader Goldmember 2,570 posts Gallery: 1 photo Likes: 250 Joined Oct 2010 Location: Charlottesville, VA More info Mar 08, 2011 08:44 | #1 There's a MkI for sale near me. Canon 1dMK4 , iso1250 , f11, 1/1000 , 420mm. Also impressive is the resulting image quality in these extender examples. JavaScript is disabled. TT1/TT5 . In the Canon EOS system, this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender is detected. EF 300mmf/2..8 L USM I & II RF Lenses or EF/RF Drop-In Filter Adapter . Recommended RF Lenses to take on an African Safari. Its also got a higher wattage rating of 600W vs 500W for the Pro. The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. It may not display this or other websites correctly. This one used an EOS 5D Mark III + EF 1.4X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport: Both of the following images were captured using a Canon EOS 6D + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. This Canon Extender 1.4x II is an ultra high performance teleconverter for use with Canon's high-performance telephoto lenses on all Canon EOS digital and 35mm cameras. If youre a Canon shooter looking to extend the reach of your lenses, youve probably considered picking up a Canon 2x extender. but as their image quality results shown on their reviews show, they can function with extenders. That would cost you only one stop,making your lenses a much more manageablef/5.6. I have the Mark II's that cost me about $200-$250 each, two or three years back. Both lenses have their pros and cons, so it really depends on what youre looking for in a lens. Because the Canon EF 2x III Extender is multiplying the aberrations/flaws of the lens it is mounted behind by 2x and because there are now 9 Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer. A significant disadvantage brought by the use of a 2x extender (any of brand or model of them) is that your lens' max aperture setting Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount. Comparing Canon's 300mm f2.8 Ls - MKI Vs MKII, Unboxing the Canon 200-400 F4 L IS 1.4 Ext, Checking Out The New Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM. i have both, 1.4x ll and i.4x lll, i used the newer one with my 400mm 5.6 on a 1dmk4 and noticed a measurable difference in IQ compared to my 1.4xmkll tc! I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! Starts improving from F/6.3 onwards till F/8.This leads to high ISO but used with R5 or R6 this will not lead to noise issues as these two mirrorless bodies handle high ISO very well as being reported. My personal opinion is that the 2x III's improvements are worth the difference in price, but we all value our images and money differently. Canon EF-S Lenses: All except for the EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM It really depends on lens . I could not see an appreciable difference in the AF speed and accuracy at all when used with current lenses. The Series III extenders include some durability improvements. IMG12 = new Image(600, 404) Take this a useful guide but not necessarily gospel! Note though that this is some beautiful light I am shooting in! So there is some new technology hidden inside these things that we have yet to unlock and as such I cant really comment on that new aspect. Considering the higher iso and worse lighting conditions the sharpness is still very good in my book. You are using an out of date browser. I'd suggest getting the 1.4II. There is very little difference to be seen in these samples but as I mentioned before , I feel that in my real world shots the MKIII was very slightly ahead in contrast at lower apertures. Is one lens better than another?, Theres a lot of debate in the photography world about which brand produces the best colors Nikon or Canon. Lets take the decrease in contrast for example. Well discuss how it works, what its made of, and how well it performs in real-world scenarios. -(older) versionsofthe following: For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. -EF 100-300mm f/5..6L USM This teleconverter will also decrease the sharpness of your images due to added optics, so its best used when shooting at lower resolutions or for less critical applications. Please check the Canon website for information about firmware updates. 0 ~ 5 . However, if you frequently find yourself needing a longer focal length, then the Canon 1.4 extender could be a worthwhile investment. But how do you use them? http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, they have new optics and new processors for improved lens/camera communications. A 2x extender will decrease your maximum aperture by 2 stops. IMG5 = new Image(604, 404) Learning when you can and should use them though can yield some excellent results. Canon 1dmk4 , iso800, f11 , 1/2000 , 600mm (300mm f2.8 L IS + 2x MKII extender). I have the 70-200 2.8L IS II and the TC-1.4 III that mounted on a 7D I use for sports. According to Chuck Westfall (Canon USA):